Let’s Cut Jill Bradbury Some Slack

Posted on 7 January 2007. Filed under: Reunifying Gally |

If you have read any of the more popular deaf blogs lately, or if you have even glanced at deafread.com, then you know three things by now:

1. There’s going to be a conference at Gallaudet on February 3, 2007. This conference is commonly described by some people as “a conference on deaf blogging”–though that isn’t actually its focus. The conference is called “Vlogging/Blogging the Future of Gallaudet” and is being set up, NOT by Gallaudet University (as seem people mistakenly believe), but by a new organization called Coalition for Critical Inquiry that was itself established by an assistant professor at Gallaudet, Jill Bradbury.

2. This conference has created a great deal of excitement among deaf bloggers. People who care about the future of deaf blogging/vlogging care about this conference because it’s the first one that acknowledges the recent explosion in the number and influence of deaf bloggers and vloggers.

3. But this conference also has created a great deal of controversy. People want it to be a more generic “deaf blogging/vlogging” conference than it’s meant to be. Some people have gotten the incorrect message that it IS a more generic “deaf vlogging/blogging” conference. So when people learn information that seems to conflict with what they perceive (mistakenly) to be the goals of the conference, they become disappointed and upset and become critical.

Let’s cut Jill Bradbury some slack here.

I do think there should be a much broader conference on blogging and vlogging in the deaf community generally. This new, emerging trend already has become enormously influential in the deaf community. The role of blogs and vlogs in shaping and stimulating the Gallaudet protests–and in stimulating both supportive and critical dialogue about these protests–is merely the most prominent and recent example. It is not the only one. The National Association of the Deaf and Jamie Berke, for example have successfully used blogs to help encourage people to write letters in support of such causes as improved captioning.

When a conference is established to address deaf blogging/vlogging in general then, yes, I think it should strive to include some of the most popular deaf bloggers and vloggers–including very controversial ones like Ricky Taylor, and quieter but much older bloggers and webbers like Jamie Berke. And I think it should also include diverse “voices” (hands?), including deaf bloggers/vloggers who are diverse in race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, religion, socio-economic class, communication background, and all the rest, even if they are not yet popular or well known.

But the upcoming Feb 3 conference is not meant to be a “deaf blogging” conference. So people shouldn’t be surprised or shocked when it falls short on supplying the type of services or content that a more generic blogging/vlogging conference would or should provide.

Please see Jill Bradbury’s text further below for clarification on the actual purpose of the conference. If we’re going to criticize the conference, or its choice of panelists, or its choice of scope, or the way its publicity has been handled, or its approach to stimulating dialogue, or anything else about it–then at least let’s get the basic facts straight first.

Will Jill Bradbury’s conference succeed in the achieving the goals she has in mind for it? I don’t know. Is this conference the best approach to stimulating civil discourse related to the Gallaudet protests and the future of the Gallaudet community? I don’t know that either.

But my feeling is this: although there has been a great deal of discourse related to the Gallaudet protests over the past six months, there has been very little civility in that discourse. That alone should be reason enough to cut Jill Bradbury some slack when she tries to introduce some civility, respect, and acceptance of diverse perspectives and opinions in a dialogue in which all three have been sorely lacking.

Jill Bradbury’s Clarification of the Purpose of “Vlogging/Blogging the Future of Gallaudet” Conference

I’m happy to see so much interest in this conference. I wanted to clarify a few issues that have been raised about the people invited to attend. First, this conference was not intended to focus primarily on blogging/vlogging. Rather, my original goal was to focus on what Gallaudet needs to do to reorient and thrive after the protests. I asked people to attend whose blogs/vlogs contained insightful, forward-looking, and innovative ideas about this topic. I went with people whose work I was familiar with and also sought input from other vloggers/bloggers. There are hundreds of high quality deaf vloggers/bloggers; it’s not possible to include them all. No slight at all is intended to those who were not invited.

Let me repeat – this conference was originally conceived as not about vlogging/blogging per se, but about Gallaudet’s future. It has, to some extent, evolved to focus on the impact of vlogging/blogging on the deaf community, but the selection of participants still reflects my original conceptualization. It was never my intention to include the most popular/influential vloggers/bloggers. I invited people based on their ideas, not their cyber lifespan, quantity of posts or quantity of hits. This is why some participants would not “technically” be considered bloggers (though to me, this raises the interesting question of definition. What, exactly, qualifies someone to be called a vlogger/blogger?)
Second, this conference is associated with the new Coalition for Critical Inquiry. The goals of this organization are two-fold:

1)to provide public forums for objective debate and critical reflection on issues arising from the Unity for Gallaudet protests.

2) to model intellectual dialogue, respect for diverse viewpoints, and commitment to social justice for the Gallaudet and larger deaf community (check out our developing web page at ccigally.info).

Vloggers/ bloggers whose work does not adhere to these criteria were not invited. This does not mean that I don’t consider their work to be important to the deaf community. I intend to have a particular kind of dialogue (respectful, thoughtful, and proactive) at the conference, and I make no apologies for that decision.

A third selection criteria was to show a diversity of perspectives in the deaf community. This is why some vloggers/bloggers may be less familiar to the general deaf community. Some were chosen to represent gender/ racial/ cultural/ communication modality diversity within the deaf community.

Finally, this conference is NOT organized by Gallaudet, but by myself under the aegis of an organization I started to encourage public analysis of issues connected to the protest. The CCI has no funds except what we can raise individually. When I first started organizing the conference, I kept it small because I didn’t know where I’d get the money to pay for flights, hotels, interpreters, etc. I’ve been fortunate to have strong interest develop from people inside and outside the university as I make progress, but we are still working with a very small budget. To anyone who feels dissatisfied with the scope of the conference, I strongly encourage you to organize your own show. Thanks for taking the time to read this post and allowing me to clear up some rumors and misconceptions.

[For more information on Jill Bradbury’s conference and her new organization, see ccigally.info. Thanks to Mike McConnell at Kokonut Plundits for posting Jill Bradbury’s clarification first.]

[Want to submit your own essay for publication at Reunify Gally? It should be related in some way to reunifying or healing the Gallaudet community in the aftermath of the protests. If interested, review my Guidelines for Guest Bloggers and submit your essay to ashettle (at) patriot.net]


Make a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

8 Responses to “Let’s Cut Jill Bradbury Some Slack”

RSS Feed for ReunifyGally Comments RSS Feed

At first, Jill referred the conference as “Deaf Blog/Vlog Conference” — now she changed the name.

The truth hurts, eh?

Stop defending her. Jill is a wacko, period.


Ridor – if you look at the original advertisement for the conference, posted back in mid-Dec. on the Gallaudet Daily Digest (see the archives), you’ll note that the conference title was then, as it always has been, “Vlogging/Blogging the Future of Gallaudet.”

Andrea, you said it better than I did. Thanks for posting this.

Jill is correct. I’ve corresponded with her few times the last two months and the emphasis was always on the role of blogging/vlogging and the future of Gallaudet.

I understand where Prof. Bradbury is coming from. It is her (and/or her group- the newly formed CCI) conference. She can do with it whatever she wants to do. I have no problems with any of it. I respect her decision(s).

I can, however, see where some people might be upset. Specifically, I see two areas:

1) The language of the announcement.

“What changes will come to Gallaudet as a result of these discussions? How is vlogging/blogging impacting the deaf community? How will new communication technology continue to change the shape of our world? This one-day conference will explore these and other questions. Vloggers/bloggers will share their ideas about how Gallaudet and the deaf community should move forward after the protests. Participants have been selected based on quality of previous posts about the protests and represent diverse perspectives in the deaf community. ”

As an outsider reading this- I am confuse. The first sentence talks specifically about Gallaudet -yet the rest the announcement talks about how blogging has impacted the rest of the Deaf community (and Gallaudet). The majority of the questions in the announcement relates not to Gallaudet- but to the rest of the Deaf World. It’s really confusing to me as to what is the conference about-i.e. is it about how blogging impacted the recent Protests? Or-as the announcement itself says “How is vlogging/blogging impacting the deaf community?”

I know that it is always easy to be critical after the fact-but I only make the following suggestion in the spirit of being helpful -perhaps a little clarity on the part of Professor Bradbury would have avoided a lot of the

2) Having seen the list of invited speakers- I do not see any reason as to why such bloggers as Ridor were not invited. In fact, if anyone should have been invited: it should have been Ridor. I am not a supporter of his. I only (at best) agree with him half the time-and sometimes he makes statements that are, in my view, baseless. But he has impacted both the Protests and the Deaf Community World Wide far more than any other blogger I know. Schroeder, Mezna, Elisha etc. etc. I suspect, own a debt of gratitude to Ridor.

He should have been invited.

I started by saying it is Prof. Bradbury conference. It is her decision -and I respect her decision. If she would have done the two steps as describe by me above, then perhaps she would not have had all the criticisms she is now getting.

Raphael J. St. Johns, C-87, G-00

Thank you, Raphael. Your comment here is a perfect example of the civil tone and spirit I like to see in the ReunifyGally blog: you express your disagreement and raise your concerns with tact and respect.

For what it’s worth, I do agree with at least the first part of your comments. The initial description of the conference was a little unclear to me, also. I posted this defense of Jill because some people were attacking her even after she came out with the clarification.

I can understand why some people got upset, but although I don’t know Jill Bradbury, I do think she deserves some benefit of the doubt. From what she has written, and from what she said in her interview with Jared Evans (in the vlog on his site), it seems she was not really expecting the broader blogging community to even be interested in this conference. From what she said in the interview, I think she simply wanted to bring outside people to campus with the purpose of exposing on-campus people who don’t normally read blogs or view vlogs to a new range of ideas. So she might have written the description with the on-campus community in mind and didn’t look at it with the perspective of an outside deaf vlogger/blogger in mind. It also seems she underestimated the intensity of pent-up demand for a more generic deaf blogging/vlogging conference. I think that pent-up demand had something to do with how people responded, too.

I’ve never set up a conference like this myself, but I’ve watched my parents set one up (a full-day workshop for a few hundred parents of deaf children in Massachusetts in the 1980s) so I know it is an ENORMOUS logistical undertaking. In many ways, the first conference was a GREAT success. Parents really really loved it. But it was also a big learning experience. For example, the child care program we offered the first year (I was I think 16 at the time and helped take care of the little kids while parents went to workshops) was poorly organized. But my parents learned from their mistakes and did much better the next year.

I have no clue if Jill has ever done a conference before. But it is safe to assume that she has probably never set up a conference before on this specific topic–because this topic hasn’t really existed before. So I think she deserves to have this one chalked up to her learning curve.

I left all of this out of my original post because it was already getting too long 🙂

[…] A few bloggers/vloggers commented on Bradbury and the conference, from ReunifyGally’s defense of Bradbury to Jared Evans’ vlog interview. This then led to the latest match between Ridor and a member […]

I understand the complexities in organ. a conference. I used to (in one of my many lives before I settled in my current job) organ. conferences as a consultant. In a given year, I could do as many as 10 conferences.

I don’t know Prof. Bradbury personally. But it would seemed to me that any college/university professor could read/write at that level-no?

I know that my second point (regarding Ridor) is debatable-fine.OK. I accept that. But I cannot understand why Prof. Bradbury would (in all honestly) write a confusion announcement as she did.

Perhaps she was late in announcing the conference? I don’t know-except to say that I am pretty sure that if she would have written a clearer, more precise announcement, then perhaps she would not have gotten any criticism.

Raphael J. St. Johns, C-87, G-00

Where's The Comment Form?

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...

%d bloggers like this: